Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Supreme Court addressed the issue of reducing compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The deceased had multiple income sources including land sale, milk supply, coconut supply, and government contracting. The High Court conservatively assessed the deceased's income at ₹20,000 per month. However, based on evidence presented, the Court re-assessed the income at ₹35,000 per month due to the deceased's multiple work activities and the subsequent loss of income after death. The appellants were awarded compensation of ₹38,81,500 with 8% interest from the claim petition date. The judgment of the High Court was modified accordingly.
The Supreme Court addressed the issue of reducing compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The deceased had multiple income sources including land sale, milk supply, coconut supply, and government contracting. The High Court conservatively assessed the deceased's income at ₹20,000 per month. However, based on evidence presented, the Court re-assessed the income at ₹35,000 per month due to the deceased's multiple work activities and the subsequent loss of income after death. The appellants were awarded compensation of ₹38,81,500 with 8% interest from the claim petition date. The judgment of the High Court was modified accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
