Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The case involved a dispute over the tax rate applicable on Long...
Tax rate dispute resolved in favor of assessee on LTCG from unlisted shares sale. Share transfer is not a business asset transfer. TDS deduction explained.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The case involved a dispute over the tax rate applicable on Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) from the sale of unlisted shares u/s 112(1)(c) of the Act. The Appellate Tribunal held that the Share Purchase Agreement did not involve the transfer of assets but was a dilution of shareholding in a joint venture. The tax authority failed to properly examine the agreement, leading to an incorrect conclusion of a sale of capital assets. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that there was no Long Term Capital Gain on the transfer of shares, and the income should not be taxed at the higher rate of 20% plus surcharge and cess. The Tribunal also accepted the explanation for the TDS deduction and rejected the tax authority's position.
The case involved a dispute over the tax rate applicable on Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) from the sale of unlisted shares u/s 112(1)(c) of the Act. The Appellate Tribunal held that the Share Purchase Agreement did not involve the transfer of assets but was a dilution of shareholding in a joint venture. The tax authority failed to properly examine the agreement, leading to an incorrect conclusion of a sale of capital assets. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that there was no Long Term Capital Gain on the transfer of shares, and the income should not be taxed at the higher rate of 20% plus surcharge and cess. The Tribunal also accepted the explanation for the TDS deduction and rejected the tax authority's position.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.