Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court considered a challenge to an order u/s WBGST Act due to a 32-day delay in filing an appeal and non-deposit of pre-deposit. The petitioner provided relevant documents supporting the case. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the appellate authority for a merit-based appeal hearing. The petitioner was directed to make a statutory pre-deposit of 10% within 10 days and provide proof of payment to the appellate authority. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.
The High Court considered a challenge to an order u/s WBGST Act due to a 32-day delay in filing an appeal and non-deposit of pre-deposit. The petitioner provided relevant documents supporting the case. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the appellate authority for a merit-based appeal hearing. The petitioner was directed to make a statutory pre-deposit of 10% within 10 days and provide proof of payment to the appellate authority. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.