Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Page of 4823
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3381 to 3400 of 96456 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court considered a challenge to an order u/s WBGST Act due to a 32-day delay in filing an appeal and non-deposit of pre-deposit. The petitioner provided relevant documents supporting the case. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the appellate authority for a merit-based appeal hearing. The petitioner was directed to make a statutory pre-deposit of 10% within 10 days and provide proof of payment to the appellate authority. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.
The High Court considered a challenge to an order u/s WBGST Act due to a 32-day delay in filing an appeal and non-deposit of pre-deposit. The petitioner provided relevant documents supporting the case. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the appellate authority for a merit-based appeal hearing. The petitioner was directed to make a statutory pre-deposit of 10% within 10 days and provide proof of payment to the appellate authority. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
