Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The case involved a dispute u/s 27 of the Customs Act regarding refund of pre-deposits paid under protest. CESTAT held that when fines and penalties are set aside, the Revenue must refund the amounts for implementation of the Appellate Authority's order. Section 11B of the Central Excise Act exempts the one-year limitation period for refunds paid under protest. The Tribunal ruled that the refund claims for redemption fine and penalties, paid under protest as directed by the department, should be processed u/s 27 of the Customs Act without being barred by limitation. The appeal was allowed as the impugned order had no merits.
The case involved a dispute u/s 27 of the Customs Act regarding refund of pre-deposits paid under protest. CESTAT held that when fines and penalties are set aside, the Revenue must refund the amounts for implementation of the Appellate Authority's order. Section 11B of the Central Excise Act exempts the one-year limitation period for refunds paid under protest. The Tribunal ruled that the refund claims for redemption fine and penalties, paid under protest as directed by the department, should be processed u/s 27 of the Customs Act without being barred by limitation. The appeal was allowed as the impugned order had no merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
