Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The case involves disputes u/s CST Act and KVAT Rules. The High Court addressed issues including whether a time gap exceeding 100 days between transit end and buyer lifting affects sale in export, treatment of stock transfer in export sales, proper apportionment methodology, and concessional tax rate eligibility. The Court held that the Tribunal erred in imposing the 100-day limit, stock transfer inclusion, and apportionment methodology. It remitted issues for reconsideration. The Court upheld the concessional tax rate for a vehicle sale but allowed penalty recomputation. The petition was partially allowed.
The case involves disputes u/s CST Act and KVAT Rules. The High Court addressed issues including whether a time gap exceeding 100 days between transit end and buyer lifting affects sale in export, treatment of stock transfer in export sales, proper apportionment methodology, and concessional tax rate eligibility. The Court held that the Tribunal erred in imposing the 100-day limit, stock transfer inclusion, and apportionment methodology. It remitted issues for reconsideration. The Court upheld the concessional tax rate for a vehicle sale but allowed penalty recomputation. The petition was partially allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
