Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
The High Court found a violation of natural justice as the petitioner's reply to the show cause notice was not considered. Discrepancies in GSTR returns were explained by the petitioner, including credit notes and missing supplier invoices. The court noted that the explanation provided was not rejected with reasons, leading to the order being set aside. The case was remanded for reconsideration, and the petition was disposed of by way of remand.
The High Court found a violation of natural justice as the petitioner's reply to the show cause notice was not considered. Discrepancies in GSTR returns were explained by the petitioner, including credit notes and missing supplier invoices. The court noted that the explanation provided was not rejected with reasons, leading to the order being set aside. The case was remanded for reconsideration, and the petition was disposed of by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
