Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The Appellate Tribunal held that the non-admission of appeal for non-payment of advance tax u/s 249(4)(b) was not justified. The assessee declared no taxable income, only agricultural income exempted under the Act 61. The computation showed non-taxable income and no liability to pay advance tax u/s 207 and 209. The CIT(A) should have admitted the appeal for adjudication on merits. The order was set aside, and the case was restored for proper verification and hearing, with the amount of advance tax payable considered as NIL. The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes.
The Appellate Tribunal held that the non-admission of appeal for non-payment of advance tax u/s 249(4)(b) was not justified. The assessee declared no taxable income, only agricultural income exempted under the Act 61. The computation showed non-taxable income and no liability to pay advance tax u/s 207 and 209. The CIT(A) should have admitted the appeal for adjudication on merits. The order was set aside, and the case was restored for proper verification and hearing, with the amount of advance tax payable considered as NIL. The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.