Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Appellate Tribunal held that the non-admission of appeal for non-payment of advance tax u/s 249(4)(b) was not justified. The assessee declared no taxable income, only agricultural income exempted under the Act 61. The computation showed non-taxable income and no liability to pay advance tax u/s 207 and 209. The CIT(A) should have admitted the appeal for adjudication on merits. The order was set aside, and the case was restored for proper verification and hearing, with the amount of advance tax payable considered as NIL. The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes.
The Appellate Tribunal held that the non-admission of appeal for non-payment of advance tax u/s 249(4)(b) was not justified. The assessee declared no taxable income, only agricultural income exempted under the Act 61. The computation showed non-taxable income and no liability to pay advance tax u/s 207 and 209. The CIT(A) should have admitted the appeal for adjudication on merits. The order was set aside, and the case was restored for proper verification and hearing, with the amount of advance tax payable considered as NIL. The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.