Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT considered the issue of addition u/s 2(22)(b) r.w.s. 56(2)(viia) concerning the treatment of bonus shares received by the assessee. The AO treated the bonus shares as dividend, but the assessee argued that bonus shares do not result in income or asset value increase. The ITAT held that bonus shares issued to equity shareholders do not fall within the scope of Sec. 2(22)(b) as it pertains to preference shares. Citing legal precedents, it was established that bonus shares do not involve profit distribution and do not alter the company's capital structure. The value of original shares decreases with bonus shares issuance, balancing any profit gained. As no fresh funds are received, Sec. 56(2)(vii)(c) does not apply. The decision favored the assessee, rejecting the revenue's claim.
The ITAT considered the issue of addition u/s 2(22)(b) r.w.s. 56(2)(viia) concerning the treatment of bonus shares received by the assessee. The AO treated the bonus shares as dividend, but the assessee argued that bonus shares do not result in income or asset value increase. The ITAT held that bonus shares issued to equity shareholders do not fall within the scope of Sec. 2(22)(b) as it pertains to preference shares. Citing legal precedents, it was established that bonus shares do not involve profit distribution and do not alter the company's capital structure. The value of original shares decreases with bonus shares issuance, balancing any profit gained. As no fresh funds are received, Sec. 56(2)(vii)(c) does not apply. The decision favored the assessee, rejecting the revenue's claim.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.