Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Appellate Tribunal held that the right to collect toll in a BOT project constitutes an intangible asset, allowing for depreciation u/s 32(1)(ii) of the Act. Citing a previous judgment, it was established that the right to operate the toll road/bridge and collect toll charges qualifies as a business or commercial right. Therefore, the appellant is eligible for depreciation on the intangible asset created through the construction of the road under the BOT contract. The appellant can claim depreciation at a rate of 25% on the road construction, as permissible for intangible assets. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.
The Appellate Tribunal held that the right to collect toll in a BOT project constitutes an intangible asset, allowing for depreciation u/s 32(1)(ii) of the Act. Citing a previous judgment, it was established that the right to operate the toll road/bridge and collect toll charges qualifies as a business or commercial right. Therefore, the appellant is eligible for depreciation on the intangible asset created through the construction of the road under the BOT contract. The appellant can claim depreciation at a rate of 25% on the road construction, as permissible for intangible assets. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.