Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The Appellate Tribunal held that the right to collect toll in a BOT project constitutes an intangible asset, allowing for depreciation u/s 32(1)(ii) of the Act. Citing a previous judgment, it was established that the right to operate the toll road/bridge and collect toll charges qualifies as a business or commercial right. Therefore, the appellant is eligible for depreciation on the intangible asset created through the construction of the road under the BOT contract. The appellant can claim depreciation at a rate of 25% on the road construction, as permissible for intangible assets. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.
The Appellate Tribunal held that the right to collect toll in a BOT project constitutes an intangible asset, allowing for depreciation u/s 32(1)(ii) of the Act. Citing a previous judgment, it was established that the right to operate the toll road/bridge and collect toll charges qualifies as a business or commercial right. Therefore, the appellant is eligible for depreciation on the intangible asset created through the construction of the road under the BOT contract. The appellant can claim depreciation at a rate of 25% on the road construction, as permissible for intangible assets. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
