Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court examined the validity of a summoning order u/s 53 r.w.s. 3 of the Benami Act, challenged on the grounds of territorial jurisdiction. The Ministry of Finance designated a Special Court u/s 50 of the Benami Act for certain districts, including where the alleged transactions occurred. The Initiating Officer found unaccounted cash deposited in a bank account during demonetization, leading to a complaint filed before the Special Court. Section 202 Cr.P.C. mandates an enquiry to determine if there are sufficient grounds for proceeding, which was satisfied in this case. The summoning order was deemed legal, as it fulfilled the requirements of Section 202 Cr.P.C. and did not cause a failure of justice.
The High Court examined the validity of a summoning order u/s 53 r.w.s. 3 of the Benami Act, challenged on the grounds of territorial jurisdiction. The Ministry of Finance designated a Special Court u/s 50 of the Benami Act for certain districts, including where the alleged transactions occurred. The Initiating Officer found unaccounted cash deposited in a bank account during demonetization, leading to a complaint filed before the Special Court. Section 202 Cr.P.C. mandates an enquiry to determine if there are sufficient grounds for proceeding, which was satisfied in this case. The summoning order was deemed legal, as it fulfilled the requirements of Section 202 Cr.P.C. and did not cause a failure of justice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
