Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The case involved confiscation of imported goods u/s 111(d) of CA 1962, re-exportation, redemption fine, and penalty u/s 112(a). Goods were imported in contravention of EPR, 1986 making them 'prohibited goods'. Confiscation u/s 111(d) precedes redemption u/s 125. Re-export permission is an administrative process post redemption. No redemption fine on re-exported goods as title vests with govt. Penalty u/s 112(a) is for breach of duty, not cured by re-export. Appellate Tribunal upheld the order, rejecting appellant's claims.
The case involved confiscation of imported goods u/s 111(d) of CA 1962, re-exportation, redemption fine, and penalty u/s 112(a). Goods were imported in contravention of EPR, 1986 making them 'prohibited goods'. Confiscation u/s 111(d) precedes redemption u/s 125. Re-export permission is an administrative process post redemption. No redemption fine on re-exported goods as title vests with govt. Penalty u/s 112(a) is for breach of duty, not cured by re-export. Appellate Tribunal upheld the order, rejecting appellant's claims.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
