Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
The case involved a dispute over a refund claim u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act. The Appellate Tribunal held that the time limitation for filing the refund claim did not apply as the duty was paid under protest. The Tribunal also ruled that the refund claims were valid even though the assessment of bills of entry was not challenged. The Revenue's argument that the refund claims were not maintainable without challenging the assessment was rejected. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, finding no merit in their arguments.
The case involved a dispute over a refund claim u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act. The Appellate Tribunal held that the time limitation for filing the refund claim did not apply as the duty was paid under protest. The Tribunal also ruled that the refund claims were valid even though the assessment of bills of entry was not challenged. The Revenue's argument that the refund claims were not maintainable without challenging the assessment was rejected. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, finding no merit in their arguments.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
