Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) considered whether the Central Processing Centre (CPC) was justified in denying the benefit of the New Tax Regime to an individual taxpayer who failed to submit Form No.10IE on time. The taxpayer filed their return of income u/s 115BAC but submitted the form late. The ITAT held that while the form is not mandatory but directory, the CPC should have considered it as it was available at the time of processing. The ITAT directed the CPC to amend the intimation to include the Form No.10IE and grant the benefit of the New Tax Regime to the taxpayer.
The Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) considered whether the Central Processing Centre (CPC) was justified in denying the benefit of the New Tax Regime to an individual taxpayer who failed to submit Form No.10IE on time. The taxpayer filed their return of income u/s 115BAC but submitted the form late. The ITAT held that while the form is not mandatory but directory, the CPC should have considered it as it was available at the time of processing. The ITAT directed the CPC to amend the intimation to include the Form No.10IE and grant the benefit of the New Tax Regime to the taxpayer.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
