Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR) considered the issue of condonation of delay in filing an appeal regarding the levy of GST on the facility of a car extended to employees in the course of employment. The appeal was filed 27 days late, but within the condonable time limit of 30 days u/s 100(2) of the CGST Act, 2017. The appellant's representative was unwell during the relevant period, and an extension of time was requested. The AAAR found sufficient cause for the delay and invoked the proviso to u/s 100(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 to condone the delay. The appeal will proceed for consideration on merits.
The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR) considered the issue of condonation of delay in filing an appeal regarding the levy of GST on the facility of a car extended to employees in the course of employment. The appeal was filed 27 days late, but within the condonable time limit of 30 days u/s 100(2) of the CGST Act, 2017. The appellant's representative was unwell during the relevant period, and an extension of time was requested. The AAAR found sufficient cause for the delay and invoked the proviso to u/s 100(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 to condone the delay. The appeal will proceed for consideration on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.