Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal upheld the reopening of assessment u/s 147 due to the assessee providing bogus accommodation loss entries. The AO had reasons to believe in the escapement of income, supported by evidence of layered transactions and unexplained deposits. The Tribunal found the AO's actions justified, as the assessee engaged in providing bogus losses and earned unaccounted brokerage income. The Tribunal rejected the assessee's contention on brokerage income calculation and upheld the addition of unaccounted income. The Tribunal also dismissed the argument against sustaining additions without cross-examination. The unexplained income received through layered transactions was deemed unexplained income. The Tribunal affirmed the decisions of the AO and CIT(A) based on the evidence presented.
The Appellate Tribunal upheld the reopening of assessment u/s 147 due to the assessee providing bogus accommodation loss entries. The AO had reasons to believe in the escapement of income, supported by evidence of layered transactions and unexplained deposits. The Tribunal found the AO's actions justified, as the assessee engaged in providing bogus losses and earned unaccounted brokerage income. The Tribunal rejected the assessee's contention on brokerage income calculation and upheld the addition of unaccounted income. The Tribunal also dismissed the argument against sustaining additions without cross-examination. The unexplained income received through layered transactions was deemed unexplained income. The Tribunal affirmed the decisions of the AO and CIT(A) based on the evidence presented.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.