Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The case involved a refund claim u/s 129A of the Customs Act, 1962 before CESTAT. The issue was regarding duty paid on re-importation of 'Ductile Iron Casting Manhole Covers, Frames & Grates' rejected by foreign customers. Assessee claimed refund citing improper assessment under N/N. 94/96-CUS and sought benefit of N/N. 158/95-CUS. The Majority decision held that the appeal was not maintainable as the matter was not referred to the Chief Commissioner of Customs as required by proviso to Section 129A. Consequently, the revenue appeal was dismissed by CESTAT.
The case involved a refund claim u/s 129A of the Customs Act, 1962 before CESTAT. The issue was regarding duty paid on re-importation of 'Ductile Iron Casting Manhole Covers, Frames & Grates' rejected by foreign customers. Assessee claimed refund citing improper assessment under N/N. 94/96-CUS and sought benefit of N/N. 158/95-CUS. The Majority decision held that the appeal was not maintainable as the matter was not referred to the Chief Commissioner of Customs as required by proviso to Section 129A. Consequently, the revenue appeal was dismissed by CESTAT.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
