Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The case involves determining the correct head of income u/s 69 and 115BB for an assessee family engaged in money lending business. The ITAT held that the undisclosed income from sundry debtors should be treated as 'business income' due to the nature of the money lending business. The lack of proper accounting records was considered, and the undisclosed income was deemed to be ploughed back into the business. The ITAT directed the AO to re-compute the income accordingly. Additionally, a dispute u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) regarding property purchase was raised, and the ITAT directed the CIT(A) to consider the issue on merits.
The case involves determining the correct head of income u/s 69 and 115BB for an assessee family engaged in money lending business. The ITAT held that the undisclosed income from sundry debtors should be treated as 'business income' due to the nature of the money lending business. The lack of proper accounting records was considered, and the undisclosed income was deemed to be ploughed back into the business. The ITAT directed the AO to re-compute the income accordingly. Additionally, a dispute u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) regarding property purchase was raised, and the ITAT directed the CIT(A) to consider the issue on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
