Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The case involves the levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 on the appellant for smuggling foreign origin cigarettes. The appellant, a freight forwarder, facilitated the clearance of smuggled goods without proper verification. The penalty of Rs. 5,00,000/- was upheld due to deliberate actions to conceal the smuggling. The appellant was given sufficient opportunity for personal hearing, meeting the principles of natural justice. The Tribunal's decision in a similar case supported the penalty imposition. The penalty on the appellant, a Proprietor in a Freight Forwarding firm, was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.
The case involves the levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 on the appellant for smuggling foreign origin cigarettes. The appellant, a freight forwarder, facilitated the clearance of smuggled goods without proper verification. The penalty of Rs. 5,00,000/- was upheld due to deliberate actions to conceal the smuggling. The appellant was given sufficient opportunity for personal hearing, meeting the principles of natural justice. The Tribunal's decision in a similar case supported the penalty imposition. The penalty on the appellant, a Proprietor in a Freight Forwarding firm, was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
