Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
The case involved a dispute regarding cash refund u/s 142(6)(a) of the CGST Act, 2017 and denial of Cenvat Credit u/s Rule 3(1) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. CESTAT allowed refund of Cenvat Credit of CVD & SAD based on precedents like SRI CHAKRA POLY PLAST INDIA PVT LTD case. The appellant was granted refund of CVD Rs.23,72,607/- and SAD Rs.10,21,081/-, excluding interest on delayed duty payment. The decision followed rulings in M/S MITHILA DRUGS PVT. LTD. and other cases. Appeal partially allowed.
The case involved a dispute regarding cash refund u/s 142(6)(a) of the CGST Act, 2017 and denial of Cenvat Credit u/s Rule 3(1) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. CESTAT allowed refund of Cenvat Credit of CVD & SAD based on precedents like SRI CHAKRA POLY PLAST INDIA PVT LTD case. The appellant was granted refund of CVD Rs.23,72,607/- and SAD Rs.10,21,081/-, excluding interest on delayed duty payment. The decision followed rulings in M/S MITHILA DRUGS PVT. LTD. and other cases. Appeal partially allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
