Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR) considered the...
Advance Ruling application questioned on GST applicability for deductions from employees' salaries. AAR Rajasthan to reconsider application for clarity.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR) considered the maintainability of an Advance Ruling application regarding the deduction made by the Appellant from employees availing food facility u/s 7 of CGST Act and Rajasthan GST Act. The issue was the applicability of GST on the nominal deduction from employee salaries and from a manpower supply contractor for contractual employees. The AAAR found that the AAR Rajasthan did not consider a relevant contract provided by the Appellant. The AAAR set aside the AAR's ruling and remanded the matter for reconsideration, directing the AAR to review the application in its entirety and address all questions posed by the Appellant.
The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR) considered the maintainability of an Advance Ruling application regarding the deduction made by the Appellant from employees availing food facility u/s 7 of CGST Act and Rajasthan GST Act. The issue was the applicability of GST on the nominal deduction from employee salaries and from a manpower supply contractor for contractual employees. The AAAR found that the AAR Rajasthan did not consider a relevant contract provided by the Appellant. The AAAR set aside the AAR's ruling and remanded the matter for reconsideration, directing the AAR to review the application in its entirety and address all questions posed by the Appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.