Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR) considered the...
Advance Ruling application questioned on GST applicability for deductions from employees' salaries. AAR Rajasthan to reconsider application for clarity.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR) considered the maintainability of an Advance Ruling application regarding the deduction made by the Appellant from employees availing food facility u/s 7 of CGST Act and Rajasthan GST Act. The issue was the applicability of GST on the nominal deduction from employee salaries and from a manpower supply contractor for contractual employees. The AAAR found that the AAR Rajasthan did not consider a relevant contract provided by the Appellant. The AAAR set aside the AAR's ruling and remanded the matter for reconsideration, directing the AAR to review the application in its entirety and address all questions posed by the Appellant.
The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR) considered the maintainability of an Advance Ruling application regarding the deduction made by the Appellant from employees availing food facility u/s 7 of CGST Act and Rajasthan GST Act. The issue was the applicability of GST on the nominal deduction from employee salaries and from a manpower supply contractor for contractual employees. The AAAR found that the AAR Rajasthan did not consider a relevant contract provided by the Appellant. The AAAR set aside the AAR's ruling and remanded the matter for reconsideration, directing the AAR to review the application in its entirety and address all questions posed by the Appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
