Functional comparability governs selection of support-service and IT-enabled service comparables, with verification required for unresolved data and m...
Bank account freezing requires statutory authority; anti-money-laundering compliance and KYC monitoring do not permit unilateral indefinite restrictio...
The case involved valuation of imported goods, undervaluation, admissibility of appellant's statement u/s 108, documentary evidence, computer printouts u/s 138C, recovery of customs duty and penalties u/s 114A, 114AA, 112(a)(ii), and 112(b)(ii) of Customs Act. The appellant's statement was held voluntary, supported by documents. Computer printouts were admissible. Undervaluation was proven. Extended limitation period applied due to intent to evade duty. Confiscation upheld due to misdeclaration. Penalties u/s 112, 114A, 114AA imposed for willful suppression. Past imports valuation not upheld. Appeal partially allowed.
The case involved valuation of imported goods, undervaluation, admissibility of appellant's statement u/s 108, documentary evidence, computer printouts u/s 138C, recovery of customs duty and penalties u/s 114A, 114AA, 112(a)(ii), and 112(b)(ii) of Customs Act. The appellant's statement was held voluntary, supported by documents. Computer printouts were admissible. Undervaluation was proven. Extended limitation period applied due to intent to evade duty. Confiscation upheld due to misdeclaration. Penalties u/s 112, 114A, 114AA imposed for willful suppression. Past imports valuation not upheld. Appeal partially allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
