Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The High Court considered the challenge to notifications u/s 168A of CGST Act and U.P. GST Act extending time for adjudication orders for F.Y. 2017-18. - Adjudication / issuance of show cause notice (SCN) u/s 73 - It held that extension of limitation is a legislative function, not administrative. The Court noted the impact of COVID-19 and Supreme Court's order on limitation. The Council's discussions on delays due to pandemic were considered relevant. The Court emphasized that legislative decisions on "force majeure" are not subject to judicial review. It rejected claims of prejudice to taxpayers, stating limitation is statutory and not a vested right. The writ petitions challenging the notifications were dismissed, allowing pending adjudication proceedings to resume and appeals to be filed within 45 days.
The High Court considered the challenge to notifications u/s 168A of CGST Act and U.P. GST Act extending time for adjudication orders for F.Y. 2017-18. - Adjudication / issuance of show cause notice (SCN) u/s 73 - It held that extension of limitation is a legislative function, not administrative. The Court noted the impact of COVID-19 and Supreme Court's order on limitation. The Council's discussions on delays due to pandemic were considered relevant. The Court emphasized that legislative decisions on "force majeure" are not subject to judicial review. It rejected claims of prejudice to taxpayers, stating limitation is statutory and not a vested right. The writ petitions challenging the notifications were dismissed, allowing pending adjudication proceedings to resume and appeals to be filed within 45 days.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.