Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The case involved a refund claim for duty paid under protest, rejected on the ground of unjust enrichment. The appellant paid duty under protest and filed a refund claim for excess duty paid. The Tribunal held that the appellant passed the bar of unjust enrichment by providing a certificate from a Chartered Accountant and showing the refund amount in the Balance sheet. The appellant was entitled to the refund as per the decision in a previous case with similar facts. The appellant was also granted interest u/s 27A of the Customs Act, 1962 from three months after filing the refund claim. The Tribunal set aside the order and allowed the appeal.
The case involved a refund claim for duty paid under protest, rejected on the ground of unjust enrichment. The appellant paid duty under protest and filed a refund claim for excess duty paid. The Tribunal held that the appellant passed the bar of unjust enrichment by providing a certificate from a Chartered Accountant and showing the refund amount in the Balance sheet. The appellant was entitled to the refund as per the decision in a previous case with similar facts. The appellant was also granted interest u/s 27A of the Customs Act, 1962 from three months after filing the refund claim. The Tribunal set aside the order and allowed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
