Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The case involves the Advance Ruling Authority (AAR) determining the applicability of the Margin Scheme u/r 32(5) of the CGST Rules, 2017 to goods such as used Iron Scrap, Lead Acid Batteries, Aluminium utensils, Steel utensils scrap, copper scrap, Brass utensils, waste plastic bags, and plastic PET bottles. The AAR held that these items do not qualify as Second Hand Goods as they are essentially scrap to be consumed or melted for manufacturing new items, thus changing their nature. Consequently, the applicant is deemed ineligible to operate under the Margin Scheme. As a result, the benefit of the Margin Scheme is not available for either intra-state or inter-state supply of goods due to the nature of the goods involved.
The case involves the Advance Ruling Authority (AAR) determining the applicability of the Margin Scheme u/r 32(5) of the CGST Rules, 2017 to goods such as used Iron Scrap, Lead Acid Batteries, Aluminium utensils, Steel utensils scrap, copper scrap, Brass utensils, waste plastic bags, and plastic PET bottles. The AAR held that these items do not qualify as Second Hand Goods as they are essentially scrap to be consumed or melted for manufacturing new items, thus changing their nature. Consequently, the applicant is deemed ineligible to operate under the Margin Scheme. As a result, the benefit of the Margin Scheme is not available for either intra-state or inter-state supply of goods due to the nature of the goods involved.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
