Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court considered a case involving fraudulent availing and passing on of Input Tax Credit u/s 132(1)(b) & (c) and u/s 132(1)(i) of Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017, through creation of fake firms. After reviewing submissions and material on record, the Court granted bail to the applicants based on the nature of the offence, lack of evidence of fake firm creation devices, and the period spent in jail. The bail application was allowed with imposed conditions.
The High Court considered a case involving fraudulent availing and passing on of Input Tax Credit u/s 132(1)(b) & (c) and u/s 132(1)(i) of Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017, through creation of fake firms. After reviewing submissions and material on record, the Court granted bail to the applicants based on the nature of the offence, lack of evidence of fake firm creation devices, and the period spent in jail. The bail application was allowed with imposed conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
