Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court considered the issue of condonation of delay in filing an appeal u/s 107 of the UPGST Act, 2017. The appeal was dismissed as time-barred, but the Court found the department's approach overly technical. The Court noted that filing within the extended time was crucial, with hard copies to follow. Citing precedent, the Court emphasized the need for the petitioner to justify the delay adequately. The Court quashed the order and directed the appellate authority to allow the petitioner another opportunity to submit medical documents before deciding on the delay application. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.
The High Court considered the issue of condonation of delay in filing an appeal u/s 107 of the UPGST Act, 2017. The appeal was dismissed as time-barred, but the Court found the department's approach overly technical. The Court noted that filing within the extended time was crucial, with hard copies to follow. Citing precedent, the Court emphasized the need for the petitioner to justify the delay adequately. The Court quashed the order and directed the appellate authority to allow the petitioner another opportunity to submit medical documents before deciding on the delay application. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.