Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Public servant status under anti-corruption law extends to recognised stock exchange leadership; constitutional and sanction challenges do not succeed...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
961 to 980 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court considered the issue of penalty levy for exporting dimensional blocks directly from unlicensed quarries u/s 11(2) of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. The petitioner exported from the quarry site instead of the licensed premises specified in the Letter of Permission. The Court noted the breach of civil obligations attracting penalty, emphasizing that penalty for tax delinquency is civil and coercive, distinct from criminal penalties. The Court upheld the penalty imposition, finding no illegality, and dismissed the petition. The petitioner's failure to comply with export regulations led to the penalty levy.
The High Court considered the issue of penalty levy for exporting dimensional blocks directly from unlicensed quarries u/s 11(2) of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. The petitioner exported from the quarry site instead of the licensed premises specified in the Letter of Permission. The Court noted the breach of civil obligations attracting penalty, emphasizing that penalty for tax delinquency is civil and coercive, distinct from criminal penalties. The Court upheld the penalty imposition, finding no illegality, and dismissed the petition. The petitioner's failure to comply with export regulations led to the penalty levy.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
