Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
941 to 960 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court considered the issue of penalty levy for exporting dimensional blocks directly from unlicensed quarries u/s 11(2) of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. The petitioner exported from the quarry site instead of the licensed premises specified in the Letter of Permission. The Court noted the breach of civil obligations attracting penalty, emphasizing that penalty for tax delinquency is civil and coercive, distinct from criminal penalties. The Court upheld the penalty imposition, finding no illegality, and dismissed the petition. The petitioner's failure to comply with export regulations led to the penalty levy.
The High Court considered the issue of penalty levy for exporting dimensional blocks directly from unlicensed quarries u/s 11(2) of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. The petitioner exported from the quarry site instead of the licensed premises specified in the Letter of Permission. The Court noted the breach of civil obligations attracting penalty, emphasizing that penalty for tax delinquency is civil and coercive, distinct from criminal penalties. The Court upheld the penalty imposition, finding no illegality, and dismissed the petition. The petitioner's failure to comply with export regulations led to the penalty levy.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.