Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Public servant status under anti-corruption law extends to recognised stock exchange leadership; constitutional and sanction challenges do not succeed...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
961 to 980 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court addressed the issue of rebate claim and the applicability of Standard Input Output Norms (SION) in determining wastage for rebate claims u/r 18 of the Rules, 2002. The department filed a revision application against rebate sanctioning. The Court held that previous recovery orders had attained finality as they were not challenged before higher authorities. The Court noted that the petitioner did not contest SION norms before the Appellate Authority, precluding them from raising the issue later. The Adjudicating Authority's incorrect calculation of SION norms was rectified by the Appellate Authority, with the Revisional Authority upholding the decision. The Court found no grounds to grant relief and dismissed the petition.
The High Court addressed the issue of rebate claim and the applicability of Standard Input Output Norms (SION) in determining wastage for rebate claims u/r 18 of the Rules, 2002. The department filed a revision application against rebate sanctioning. The Court held that previous recovery orders had attained finality as they were not challenged before higher authorities. The Court noted that the petitioner did not contest SION norms before the Appellate Authority, precluding them from raising the issue later. The Adjudicating Authority's incorrect calculation of SION norms was rectified by the Appellate Authority, with the Revisional Authority upholding the decision. The Court found no grounds to grant relief and dismissed the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
