Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
941 to 960 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court addressed the issue of rebate claim and the applicability of Standard Input Output Norms (SION) in determining wastage for rebate claims u/r 18 of the Rules, 2002. The department filed a revision application against rebate sanctioning. The Court held that previous recovery orders had attained finality as they were not challenged before higher authorities. The Court noted that the petitioner did not contest SION norms before the Appellate Authority, precluding them from raising the issue later. The Adjudicating Authority's incorrect calculation of SION norms was rectified by the Appellate Authority, with the Revisional Authority upholding the decision. The Court found no grounds to grant relief and dismissed the petition.
The High Court addressed the issue of rebate claim and the applicability of Standard Input Output Norms (SION) in determining wastage for rebate claims u/r 18 of the Rules, 2002. The department filed a revision application against rebate sanctioning. The Court held that previous recovery orders had attained finality as they were not challenged before higher authorities. The Court noted that the petitioner did not contest SION norms before the Appellate Authority, precluding them from raising the issue later. The Adjudicating Authority's incorrect calculation of SION norms was rectified by the Appellate Authority, with the Revisional Authority upholding the decision. The Court found no grounds to grant relief and dismissed the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
