Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
541 to 560 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court addressed the issue of rebate claim and the applicability of Standard Input Output Norms (SION) in determining wastage for rebate claims u/r 18 of the Rules, 2002. The department filed a revision application against rebate sanctioning. The Court held that previous recovery orders had attained finality as they were not challenged before higher authorities. The Court noted that the petitioner did not contest SION norms before the Appellate Authority, precluding them from raising the issue later. The Adjudicating Authority's incorrect calculation of SION norms was rectified by the Appellate Authority, with the Revisional Authority upholding the decision. The Court found no grounds to grant relief and dismissed the petition.
The High Court addressed the issue of rebate claim and the applicability of Standard Input Output Norms (SION) in determining wastage for rebate claims u/r 18 of the Rules, 2002. The department filed a revision application against rebate sanctioning. The Court held that previous recovery orders had attained finality as they were not challenged before higher authorities. The Court noted that the petitioner did not contest SION norms before the Appellate Authority, precluding them from raising the issue later. The Adjudicating Authority's incorrect calculation of SION norms was rectified by the Appellate Authority, with the Revisional Authority upholding the decision. The Court found no grounds to grant relief and dismissed the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
