Advance-ruling mechanism governs pending GST classification, exemption and taxability disputes, limiting writ review once the specialised forum functi...
Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
In a case before the High Court, the issue was whether de-oiled items used as animal-food, cattle-food, poultry-food, and fish-food are exempt goods. The Doctrine of Ejusdem generis was not considered. The revisionist argued that paddy husk is not covered by the relevant entry and is not exempt. The Court held that the question was already answered by the Supreme Court in a previous case where it was established that certain by-products, including de-oiled items, are exempt under the VAT Act. Since the legal issue was settled u/s the Supreme Court decision, the revision was dismissed at the admission stage.
In a case before the High Court, the issue was whether de-oiled items used as animal-food, cattle-food, poultry-food, and fish-food are exempt goods. The Doctrine of Ejusdem generis was not considered. The revisionist argued that paddy husk is not covered by the relevant entry and is not exempt. The Court held that the question was already answered by the Supreme Court in a previous case where it was established that certain by-products, including de-oiled items, are exempt under the VAT Act. Since the legal issue was settled u/s the Supreme Court decision, the revision was dismissed at the admission stage.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
