Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
AT considered the determination of gross amount for service tax u/r Works Contract (Composition Scheme for Payment of Service Tax) Rules, 2007. Issue was inclusion of equipment and materials value in determining "gross amount" for service tax levy. Appellant had 2 contracts with WBPDCL. CBEC Circular clarified that value of goods supplied u/s Contract I not included in gross value for service tax u/s composition scheme for Contract II. Appellant correctly paid tax for Contract II. Penalty proceedings deemed unsustainable, hence no penalty imposed. Impugned demand set aside, appeal allowed.
AT considered the determination of gross amount for service tax u/r Works Contract (Composition Scheme for Payment of Service Tax) Rules, 2007. Issue was inclusion of equipment and materials value in determining "gross amount" for service tax levy. Appellant had 2 contracts with WBPDCL. CBEC Circular clarified that value of goods supplied u/s Contract I not included in gross value for service tax u/s composition scheme for Contract II. Appellant correctly paid tax for Contract II. Penalty proceedings deemed unsustainable, hence no penalty imposed. Impugned demand set aside, appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
