Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2161 to 2180 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
AT considered the determination of gross amount for service tax u/r Works Contract (Composition Scheme for Payment of Service Tax) Rules, 2007. Issue was inclusion of equipment and materials value in determining "gross amount" for service tax levy. Appellant had 2 contracts with WBPDCL. CBEC Circular clarified that value of goods supplied u/s Contract I not included in gross value for service tax u/s composition scheme for Contract II. Appellant correctly paid tax for Contract II. Penalty proceedings deemed unsustainable, hence no penalty imposed. Impugned demand set aside, appeal allowed.
AT considered the determination of gross amount for service tax u/r Works Contract (Composition Scheme for Payment of Service Tax) Rules, 2007. Issue was inclusion of equipment and materials value in determining "gross amount" for service tax levy. Appellant had 2 contracts with WBPDCL. CBEC Circular clarified that value of goods supplied u/s Contract I not included in gross value for service tax u/s composition scheme for Contract II. Appellant correctly paid tax for Contract II. Penalty proceedings deemed unsustainable, hence no penalty imposed. Impugned demand set aside, appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
