Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT Mumbai addressed CENVAT Credit issues on Rent-a-Cab services and insurance services u/s Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Rent-a-Cab services were denied credit initially, but tribunal allowed it as the vehicles were used for output services. Motor vehicles used did not qualify as capital goods. Insurance services were deemed eligible as they were not for personal use or employee consumption. Tribunal cited precedent for insurance service credit. Services excluded post-amendment were listed, but insurance services were found eligible for credit. Impugned order partially allowed appeal for insurance services but denied for Rent-a-Cab services.
CESTAT Mumbai addressed CENVAT Credit issues on Rent-a-Cab services and insurance services u/s Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Rent-a-Cab services were denied credit initially, but tribunal allowed it as the vehicles were used for output services. Motor vehicles used did not qualify as capital goods. Insurance services were deemed eligible as they were not for personal use or employee consumption. Tribunal cited precedent for insurance service credit. Services excluded post-amendment were listed, but insurance services were found eligible for credit. Impugned order partially allowed appeal for insurance services but denied for Rent-a-Cab services.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
