Proportionality in company penalty quantification requires aggravating and mitigating factors; mechanical multiplication of director liability is impe...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3341 to 3360 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT Mumbai addressed CENVAT Credit issues on Rent-a-Cab services and insurance services u/s Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Rent-a-Cab services were denied credit initially, but tribunal allowed it as the vehicles were used for output services. Motor vehicles used did not qualify as capital goods. Insurance services were deemed eligible as they were not for personal use or employee consumption. Tribunal cited precedent for insurance service credit. Services excluded post-amendment were listed, but insurance services were found eligible for credit. Impugned order partially allowed appeal for insurance services but denied for Rent-a-Cab services.
CESTAT Mumbai addressed CENVAT Credit issues on Rent-a-Cab services and insurance services u/s Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Rent-a-Cab services were denied credit initially, but tribunal allowed it as the vehicles were used for output services. Motor vehicles used did not qualify as capital goods. Insurance services were deemed eligible as they were not for personal use or employee consumption. Tribunal cited precedent for insurance service credit. Services excluded post-amendment were listed, but insurance services were found eligible for credit. Impugned order partially allowed appeal for insurance services but denied for Rent-a-Cab services.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
