Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Public servant status under anti-corruption law extends to recognised stock exchange leadership; constitutional and sanction challenges do not succeed...
Acquiescence, homebuyer protection and clean-slate resolution principles prevent landowners from disrupting an integrated project through late termina...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1001 to 1020 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Delhi High Court addressed the disallowance of provision for unsettled claims and Incurred But Not Reported (IBNR) Claims Reserve. The court held that the provision for outstanding claims can be allowed when materialized, not in the current year. The Tribunal's decision to delete the addition was justified as the provision was made based on claims lodged. The IBNR provisioning is regulated by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India Regulations, not considered a contingent liability. The court emphasized reasonable estimation and actuarial methods for liability quantification. The decision was against the revenue authority.
The Delhi High Court addressed the disallowance of provision for unsettled claims and Incurred But Not Reported (IBNR) Claims Reserve. The court held that the provision for outstanding claims can be allowed when materialized, not in the current year. The Tribunal's decision to delete the addition was justified as the provision was made based on claims lodged. The IBNR provisioning is regulated by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India Regulations, not considered a contingent liability. The court emphasized reasonable estimation and actuarial methods for liability quantification. The decision was against the revenue authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
