Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Delhi High Court addressed the disallowance of provision for unsettled claims and Incurred But Not Reported (IBNR) Claims Reserve. The court held that the provision for outstanding claims can be allowed when materialized, not in the current year. The Tribunal's decision to delete the addition was justified as the provision was made based on claims lodged. The IBNR provisioning is regulated by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India Regulations, not considered a contingent liability. The court emphasized reasonable estimation and actuarial methods for liability quantification. The decision was against the revenue authority.
The Delhi High Court addressed the disallowance of provision for unsettled claims and Incurred But Not Reported (IBNR) Claims Reserve. The court held that the provision for outstanding claims can be allowed when materialized, not in the current year. The Tribunal's decision to delete the addition was justified as the provision was made based on claims lodged. The IBNR provisioning is regulated by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India Regulations, not considered a contingent liability. The court emphasized reasonable estimation and actuarial methods for liability quantification. The decision was against the revenue authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
