Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT Mumbai addressed the issue of addition u/s 68 regarding penny stock transactions. The genuineness of share transactions was questioned, with the assessee claiming to be an investor supported by evidence such as financials, share price trends, and company existence. The AO doubted the transactions but failed to prove unaccounted money. The assessee's regular investment pattern through registered brokers, STT payments, and banking channel transactions were highlighted. Lack of AO's independent investigation and reliance on statements were noted. The Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)'s decision, directing deletion of additions u/s 68 & 69C in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the substantiated nature of the share transactions.
The ITAT Mumbai addressed the issue of addition u/s 68 regarding penny stock transactions. The genuineness of share transactions was questioned, with the assessee claiming to be an investor supported by evidence such as financials, share price trends, and company existence. The AO doubted the transactions but failed to prove unaccounted money. The assessee's regular investment pattern through registered brokers, STT payments, and banking channel transactions were highlighted. Lack of AO's independent investigation and reliance on statements were noted. The Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)'s decision, directing deletion of additions u/s 68 & 69C in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the substantiated nature of the share transactions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
