Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The case concerns the classification of services provided by the applicant to the R&B department of the Government of Gujarat. The issue was whether the services of preparing plans, estimates, and DTP for building works qualify as pure services and are exempt u/s 3 of N/N. 12/2017-CT (R). The Authority for advance ruling (AAR) held that the services provided were indeed pure services. However, the blanket exemption sought by the applicant for all buildings constructed for the State government was not granted. The applicant must prove that the buildings are related to functions entrusted to a Panchayat or Municipality to be eligible for the exemption. The services provided do not qualify as activities u/r Article 243G or 243W of the Constitution.
The case concerns the classification of services provided by the applicant to the R&B department of the Government of Gujarat. The issue was whether the services of preparing plans, estimates, and DTP for building works qualify as pure services and are exempt u/s 3 of N/N. 12/2017-CT (R). The Authority for advance ruling (AAR) held that the services provided were indeed pure services. However, the blanket exemption sought by the applicant for all buildings constructed for the State government was not granted. The applicant must prove that the buildings are related to functions entrusted to a Panchayat or Municipality to be eligible for the exemption. The services provided do not qualify as activities u/r Article 243G or 243W of the Constitution.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
