Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
The case concerns the classification of services provided by the applicant to the R&B department of the Government of Gujarat. The issue was whether the services of preparing plans, estimates, and DTP for building works qualify as pure services and are exempt u/s 3 of N/N. 12/2017-CT (R). The Authority for advance ruling (AAR) held that the services provided were indeed pure services. However, the blanket exemption sought by the applicant for all buildings constructed for the State government was not granted. The applicant must prove that the buildings are related to functions entrusted to a Panchayat or Municipality to be eligible for the exemption. The services provided do not qualify as activities u/r Article 243G or 243W of the Constitution.
The case concerns the classification of services provided by the applicant to the R&B department of the Government of Gujarat. The issue was whether the services of preparing plans, estimates, and DTP for building works qualify as pure services and are exempt u/s 3 of N/N. 12/2017-CT (R). The Authority for advance ruling (AAR) held that the services provided were indeed pure services. However, the blanket exemption sought by the applicant for all buildings constructed for the State government was not granted. The applicant must prove that the buildings are related to functions entrusted to a Panchayat or Municipality to be eligible for the exemption. The services provided do not qualify as activities u/r Article 243G or 243W of the Constitution.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
