Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2161 to 2180 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The case concerns the classification of services provided by the applicant to the R&B department of the Government of Gujarat. The issue was whether the services of preparing plans, estimates, and DTP for building works qualify as pure services and are exempt u/s 3 of N/N. 12/2017-CT (R). The Authority for advance ruling (AAR) held that the services provided were indeed pure services. However, the blanket exemption sought by the applicant for all buildings constructed for the State government was not granted. The applicant must prove that the buildings are related to functions entrusted to a Panchayat or Municipality to be eligible for the exemption. The services provided do not qualify as activities u/r Article 243G or 243W of the Constitution.
The case concerns the classification of services provided by the applicant to the R&B department of the Government of Gujarat. The issue was whether the services of preparing plans, estimates, and DTP for building works qualify as pure services and are exempt u/s 3 of N/N. 12/2017-CT (R). The Authority for advance ruling (AAR) held that the services provided were indeed pure services. However, the blanket exemption sought by the applicant for all buildings constructed for the State government was not granted. The applicant must prove that the buildings are related to functions entrusted to a Panchayat or Municipality to be eligible for the exemption. The services provided do not qualify as activities u/r Article 243G or 243W of the Constitution.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
