Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Employee conflict disclosures and investment restrictions expand with new recusal duties, post-employment limits, and compliance reporting requirement...
The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal due to time limitation...
Retrospective cancellation of GST registration for business closure lacks details; violation of natural justice. Registration cancelled from application date.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal due to time limitation regarding the retrospective cancellation of GST registration of the petitioner based on discontinuance of business. The court found the impugned order lacking in details and violating principles of natural justice. Section 29(2) of the Act allows cancellation of registration from a retrospective date based on objective criteria. The court modified the order to cancel registration from the date the petitioner applied for cancellation. The petitioner must comply with Section 29 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal due to time limitation regarding the retrospective cancellation of GST registration of the petitioner based on discontinuance of business. The court found the impugned order lacking in details and violating principles of natural justice. Section 29(2) of the Act allows cancellation of registration from a retrospective date based on objective criteria. The court modified the order to cancel registration from the date the petitioner applied for cancellation. The petitioner must comply with Section 29 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
