Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal due to time limitation...
Retrospective cancellation of GST registration for business closure lacks details; violation of natural justice. Registration cancelled from application date.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal due to time limitation regarding the retrospective cancellation of GST registration of the petitioner based on discontinuance of business. The court found the impugned order lacking in details and violating principles of natural justice. Section 29(2) of the Act allows cancellation of registration from a retrospective date based on objective criteria. The court modified the order to cancel registration from the date the petitioner applied for cancellation. The petitioner must comply with Section 29 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal due to time limitation regarding the retrospective cancellation of GST registration of the petitioner based on discontinuance of business. The court found the impugned order lacking in details and violating principles of natural justice. Section 29(2) of the Act allows cancellation of registration from a retrospective date based on objective criteria. The court modified the order to cancel registration from the date the petitioner applied for cancellation. The petitioner must comply with Section 29 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
