Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1181 to 1200 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Rajasthan High Court addressed the issue of refunding unutilized Input Tax Credit (ITC) used for zero-rated supply of goods. The petitioner sought refund under the "Any Other" category on the GST portal for Dec. 2018. Upon realizing an arithmetical error in previous refund applications, supplementary applications were submitted. Citing a Gujarat High Court decision, the High Court held that substantive entitlement cannot be denied due to technical errors. The petition was disposed of, allowing manual submission of refund applications for the remaining amount. The respondent authorities were directed to scrutinize the claims in accordance with the law.
The Rajasthan High Court addressed the issue of refunding unutilized Input Tax Credit (ITC) used for zero-rated supply of goods. The petitioner sought refund under the "Any Other" category on the GST portal for Dec. 2018. Upon realizing an arithmetical error in previous refund applications, supplementary applications were submitted. Citing a Gujarat High Court decision, the High Court held that substantive entitlement cannot be denied due to technical errors. The petition was disposed of, allowing manual submission of refund applications for the remaining amount. The respondent authorities were directed to scrutinize the claims in accordance with the law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
