Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The Rajasthan High Court addressed the issue of refunding unutilized Input Tax Credit (ITC) used for zero-rated supply of goods. The petitioner sought refund under the "Any Other" category on the GST portal for Dec. 2018. Upon realizing an arithmetical error in previous refund applications, supplementary applications were submitted. Citing a Gujarat High Court decision, the High Court held that substantive entitlement cannot be denied due to technical errors. The petition was disposed of, allowing manual submission of refund applications for the remaining amount. The respondent authorities were directed to scrutinize the claims in accordance with the law.
The Rajasthan High Court addressed the issue of refunding unutilized Input Tax Credit (ITC) used for zero-rated supply of goods. The petitioner sought refund under the "Any Other" category on the GST portal for Dec. 2018. Upon realizing an arithmetical error in previous refund applications, supplementary applications were submitted. Citing a Gujarat High Court decision, the High Court held that substantive entitlement cannot be denied due to technical errors. The petition was disposed of, allowing manual submission of refund applications for the remaining amount. The respondent authorities were directed to scrutinize the claims in accordance with the law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
